View Full Version : Charger SRT-8 - low miles <$25k
LiquidClen
06-12-2009, 05:39 PM
Poll
slim8605
06-12-2009, 06:32 PM
no
Sex Cells
06-13-2009, 12:28 AM
They're cool cars but they have a shitty interior and the front fascia is very easy to destroy. Costs a couple grand to replace too.
mackin
06-13-2009, 01:31 PM
chargers are played.
Toasted1
06-15-2009, 08:30 PM
Do want
galacticmonkey
06-15-2009, 08:40 PM
Can I hab it?
crownvic21
06-18-2009, 01:42 AM
Maybe, i say no
John3000
06-20-2009, 12:31 PM
Automatic Muscle Car = Fail.
sks_lex
06-24-2009, 07:32 PM
No 6 speed option?
IamDeMan
06-24-2009, 07:39 PM
Automatic Muscle Car = Fail.
Idiotic generalizations = Fail
Spider Monkey
06-24-2009, 07:40 PM
What? All of the muscle cars of old were autos.
bigtoyota479
06-24-2009, 07:41 PM
Not all, but about 90% were, yes.
Toasted1
06-24-2009, 09:19 PM
Automatic Muscle Car = Fail.
Have to agree, more personal preference than anything..
John3000
06-25-2009, 10:57 AM
Idiotic generalizations = Fail
Personal opinion, don't get all fussy........:bootyshake:
Have to agree, more personal preference than anything..
This.
srtmat
07-05-2009, 08:50 PM
What year?
How low is low miles?
They are pretty fun in a straight line.
I'd rather keep my woody wagon fro free.
LiquidClen
07-07-2009, 04:33 PM
supas mom has mor whoresepower
do you even know who the fuck supa's mom is
darthvibrator
07-19-2009, 05:07 PM
425hp...nuff said
...at 4200lbs
darthvibrator
07-19-2009, 07:01 PM
That's pretty light.
until wErd and his 300lbs of bud he needs to function gets in the car.
Is he a huge bitch? Because even with the weed he's still only even with my car.
Sex Cells
07-19-2009, 07:23 PM
...at 4200lbs
That's not that much now days.
darthvibrator
07-19-2009, 07:26 PM
Is he a huge bitch? Because even with the weed he's still only even with my car.
i dont know. its all i had. i just blurted some random shit out because 425hp at the crank really aint shit IMO for a 4200 lb "high performance" car.
Sex Cells
07-19-2009, 07:31 PM
i dont know. its all i had. i just blurted some random shit out because 425hp at the crank really aint shit IMO for a 4200 lb "high performance" car.
Good luck finding a faster full size sedan in that price range.
darthvibrator
07-19-2009, 07:36 PM
Good luck finding a faster full size sedan in that price range.
why you mad? cause i dont consider it fast?
c63...451hp...3700lbs (depending on the source)...not that fast to me
e63...507hp...4100lbs (depending on the source)...pretty quick
charger...425hp...4200-4300lbs (depending on source)...no thanks
for 25k, ill pick up a 04 cobra and start from there.
Sex Cells
07-19-2009, 07:46 PM
Well despite what you think, 0-60 in 4.7-5 seconds is FAST for a full size sedan.
The C Class is not a full size sedan, and for 15k more i would sure as fuck hope it was faster.
Same story with the E class
An 04 cobra? Why not a Hayabusa? Would prove your point just as well.
You are a MB fanboi by the way.
But we still love you.
darthvibrator
07-19-2009, 07:52 PM
Well despite what you think, 0-60 in 4.7-5 seconds is FAST for a full size sedan.
The C Class is not a full size sedan, and for 15k more i would sure as fuck hope it was faster.
Same story with the E class
An 04 cobra? Why not a Hayabusa? Would prove your point just as well.
You are a MB fanboi by the way.
But we still love you.
i wasnt calling the c a full size sedan. i was just talking about cars ive actually driven. i havent driven any fast cars besides mb cars, how else would i be able to compare what i feel is fast?
i also never brought up the full size sedan part.that was your argument, sexy boy. im simply talking about cars that i think are fast, versus not fast.
i used to work at chrysler/dodge. never did drive a srt8 charger. but considering that i work at MB now i have driven lots of amg cars which gives me some background that lets me actually say what i think is fast, versus some dude that just goes off numbers. i am going off numbers with the charger, but at least ive been behind the wheel of cars that i feel i can actually compare now.
why a cobra? because its 25k, and its a car that has supposed potential for lots more power for relatively cheap (5k).
edit: but yes, i am somewhat of an MB fan boy now. but thats because i actually see these cars day in and day out and i feel confident that they really are great cars. JMO
Sex Cells
07-19-2009, 07:57 PM
i wasnt calling the c a full size sedan. i was just talking about cars ive actually driven. i havent driven any fast cars besides mb cars, how else would i be able to compare what i feel is fast?
i also never brought up the full size sedan part.that was your argument, sexy boy. im simply talking about cars that i think are fast, versus not fast.
i used to work at chrysler/dodge. never did drive a srt8 charger. but considering that i work at MB now i have driven lots of amg cars which gives me some background that lets me actually say what i think is fast, versus some dude that just goes off numbers. i am going off numbers with the charger, but i am comparing it to others thats ive experienced.
why a cobra? because its 25k, and its a car that has supposed potential for lots more power for relatively cheap (5k).
The large sedan thing wasn't my thing, its the thread. By your rational, the e63 and c63 are slow pieces of shit. OP should look at an SLR.
darthvibrator
07-19-2009, 07:58 PM
The large sedan thing wasn't my thing, its the thread. By your rational, the e63 and c63 are slow pieces of shit. OP should look at an SLR.
well ok...you got me there.
i didnt say the mb's were slow, im just saying if i consider the e63 pretty quick, and it has almost 100hp more and weighs less, than the charger would be slow(but thats just going off the numbers...:crap:), IMO. and by "not that fast to me" for the c63, that opinion is basically formed off the fact that it got hyped up so much, and then when i romped on it...i was disappointed. all these cars mentioned are probably fast enough for most people to get hurt in.
Preston is right, your entire arguing system is flawed. But you already know this.
darthvibrator
07-21-2009, 09:02 AM
Preston is right, your entire arguing system is flawed. But you already know this.
not really. originally i said to me the charger isnt fast, because ive driven cars with more power that weighed less which i still didnt think were that crazy.
end of story. that was all i said. sexy boy flipped out and started to go off on a whole other argument.
my original post was my opinion, which cant be flawed because its an opinion.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.